When a government agency kills people and the political party that claims to oppose it responds with little more than press releases, something is deeply broken. That’s the warning embedded in a new piece from The Intercept about recent fatal shootings by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the slow, cautious reaction from Democrats in Congress.

Rep. Delia Ramirez put it bluntly: “It feels like we’re normalizing it.” She’s talking about deadly violence carried out in our name—by an agency whose abuses have been documented for years—and a political system that treats it as just another unfortunate headline.

This matters because it’s about more than immigration policy or partisan strategy. It’s about whether human rights are actually non-negotiable, whether state violence has any real limits, and whether a party that brands itself as pro-immigrant and pro-justice will do anything more than wring its hands when those values are tested.

—

1. Background: ICE, Fatal Shootings, and Congressional Silence

ICE was created in 2003 as part of the post-9/11 security apparatus, folded into the newly formed Department of Homeland Security. From the beginning, it operated with wide discretion and minimal public scrutiny. Its mandate: enforce civil immigration law through arrests, detention, and deportation.

Over the last decade, watchdog groups, journalists, and advocates have exposed a pattern of abuses:

– People killed during raids or enforcement actions
– Widespread medical neglect in detention
– Sexual abuse and harassment
– Retaliation against immigrants who speak out
– Collaboration with local police that funnels people into deportation pipelines

The recent shootings highlighted by The Intercept are not isolated incidents; they sit atop a long history of ICE violence. What’s different now is how familiar it all feels—and how little urgency we see from the party that controls major levers of power.

According to the article, ICE officers were involved in fatal shootings that should have triggered immediate, visible oversight: emergency hearings, subpoena-backed investigations, public demands for accountability, and serious legislative proposals to limit or dismantle ICE’s power. Instead, we’re seeing:

– A handful of progressive lawmakers calling for investigations or abolition
– Leadership offering vague statements about “reviewing the situation”
– No unified caucus strategy, no clear timeline, and no consequences for ICE

Rep. Ramirez’s concern—that Democrats are normalizing lethal violence by failing to act—is not rhetorical. It’s a description of what happens when state violence becomes routine and the official response is procedural delay.

—

2. Why Democrats Are Dragging Their Feet

From a progressive perspective, the lack of action is not a mystery—it’s a symptom of deeper political dynamics.

Fear of Right-Wing Backlash

Democratic leadership has long been wary of appearing “soft on immigration” or “anti-law enforcement.” They know Republicans will weaponize any effort to rein in ICE as proof that Democrats support “open borders” or are undermining “national security.”

Rather than challenge that framing head-on, many Democrats try to split the difference: condemn “excesses” while defending the agency’s existence, call for “reforms” while avoiding structural change, and speak the language of “balance” instead of rights.

The Politics of Respectability

Even in the face of killings, leadership often defaults to a cautious, institutionalist posture:

– Let internal investigations play out
– Wait for inspector general reports
– Focus on “improving training” or “enhancing oversight”

This respectability politics treats deadly violence as a technical problem, not a moral emergency. It prioritizes process over protection and optics over lives.

Divisions Within the Party

There is a real split between more centrist Democrats and the progressive wing:

– Progressives have openly called for abolishing or fundamentally restructuring ICE.
– Centrists prefer incremental reforms and worry that abolition rhetoric is politically risky.

This tension often results in paralysis. Leadership doesn’t want a public fight within the party, so they avoid bold moves and hope the news cycle moves on.

A Deeper Normalization of State Violence

ICE isn’t unique. We see similar patterns with police killings, Border Patrol abuses, and prison conditions. The state’s use of violence—especially against poor, Black, brown, and immigrant communities—is treated as a regrettable but accepted feature of governance.

When Democrats fail to respond decisively, they reinforce the idea that some lives are negotiable, that some communities are expendable, and that “security” justifies almost anything.

—

3. The Progressive Lens: Abolition, Accountability, and Human Rights

From a progressive standpoint, the core issue isn’t whether ICE followed its own internal protocols during these shootings. The issue is whether an agency with a long record of brutality should be allowed to keep operating with expanding budgets, minimal accountability, and lethal force.

Abolition vs. Reform

Progressives have been clear: ICE is not just a flawed agency; it’s a vehicle for systemic harm. Abolition doesn’t mean chaos or “no immigration enforcement.” It means:

– Ending ICE as we know it
– Shifting immigration to a civil, non-militarized framework
– Focusing on due process, family unity, and human rights
– Building systems that prioritize safety and dignity over punishment

Democrats who shy away from abolition often talk about “reform,” but reform without power shifts tends to be cosmetic: new guidelines, new trainings, new PR campaigns—same violence.

Accountability That Actually Has Teeth

Real accountability would look like:

– Independent investigations with subpoena power
– Public reporting on use-of-force incidents
– Criminal prosecution when officers violate the law
– Budget cuts and restructuring when agencies show patterns of abuse
– Clear legal limits on when and how ICE can use force

When fatal shootings occur and none of this happens, it sends a message: ICE can kill, and Congress will mostly watch.

Centering the People Most Affected

Progressive analysis insists that the voices of immigrants, detainees, families of those killed, and grassroots organizers must lead the conversation. They’ve been warning about ICE for years:

– Deportations tearing apart families
– Raids terrorizing entire neighborhoods
– Detention centers functioning as de facto prisons

Ignoring their demands—especially for abolition—while offering vague promises of “review” is not just a policy failure; it’s a refusal to recognize impacted communities as political actors with legitimate power.

—

4. What’s at Stake for Social Justice

This story isn’t only about immigration. It’s about whether progressive values have real political weight when they collide with entrenched systems of state violence.

Human Rights vs. National Security Narratives

ICE operates in a space where “national security” rhetoric often overrides human rights concerns. If Democrats won’t challenge that framing, then human rights become optional—something to be invoked in speeches but sacrificed in practice.

The Value of Immigrant Lives

When fatal shootings by ICE pass with minimal political response, the implication is that immigrant lives are less urgent, less worthy of emergency action, less likely to move the machinery of the state.

For a movement grounded in social justice, that’s unacceptable. Progressive values demand that:

– No one is disposable because of their immigration status
– Borders do not erase basic rights
– The state’s monopoly on violence must be tightly constrained

Precedent for Other Struggles

How Democrats handle ICE is a preview of how they’ll handle other crises:

– Police killings of Black and brown people
– Abuse in prisons and jails
– Militarized responses to protests
– Surveillance and repression of activists

If the pattern is: condemn, delay, and then do nothing structural, it signals that the party is more comfortable managing outrage than dismantling injustice.

—

5. What People Can Do—and How to Stay Informed

The normalization Rep. Ramirez warns about only becomes permanent if we let it. There are concrete ways to push back:

Support Organizations on the Front Lines

Look for and support groups that:

– Provide legal aid to immigrants
– Document ICE abuses
– Organize for abolition and transformative justice
– Offer rapid response during raids

Examples include local immigrant justice coalitions, community defense networks, and national groups focused on ending detention and deportation.

Pressure Your Representatives

Even if your member of Congress is a Democrat, don’t assume they’re doing enough. You can:

– Call, email, and attend town halls to demand:
– Public support for investigations into ICE shootings
– Co-sponsorship of bills to limit or dismantle ICE
– Opposition to increased ICE and DHS funding
– Ask them directly: Do you support abolishing ICE? If not, why?

Specific, public pressure matters. Politicians move when they know voters are paying attention.

Stay Informed Beyond Mainstream Soundbites

Corporate media often frames these issues through “security” or “border crisis” narratives. To get a fuller picture, follow:

– Independent outlets like The Intercept
– Immigration and human rights reporters
– Grassroots organizations that share first-hand stories and data

Reading the full Intercept article is a good starting point. It offers details and context that rarely make it into cable news coverage.

Connect the Dots

Don’t treat ICE as an isolated problem. See it as part of a broader system of:

– Criminalization of migration
– Racist policing and mass incarceration
– Militarized borders and surveillance

When we connect these struggles, we can build coalitions strong enough to demand more than symbolic reform—and to insist that the state’s power to harm be fundamentally curtailed.

—

The fatal ICE shootings covered by The Intercept are not just tragedies; they’re tests. They ask whether Democrats will treat immigrant lives as expendable, whether “law enforcement” will remain a shield for lethal abuse, and whether progressive values can survive contact with real power.

Normalization is a choice. So is resistance.

Read the original article here: https://theintercept.com/2026/07/17/democrats-congress-abolish-ice-killings/

Photo by vale on Unsplash